Desirability Function Analysis (DFA) in Multiple Responses Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/rme200103011pKeywords:
Abrasive water jet, Cutting depth, Surface roughness, Desirability functionAbstract
This paper introduces optimization of machining parameters for high-pressure abrasive water jet cutting of Hardox 500 steel utilizing desirability function analysis (DFA). The tests were carried out according to the orthogonal matrix (Taguchi) L9. The control parameters of the process such as pressure, abrasive flow rate, and traverse speed was optimized under multi-response conditions namely cutting depth and surface roughness. The optimal set of control parameters was established on the basis of the composite desirability value obtained from desirability function analysis and the significance of these parameters was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effects show that optimal sets for high cutting depth and small surface roughness is high pressure, middle abrasive flow rate, and small traverse speed. A confirmation test was also leaded to validate the test results. Results of the research have shown that machining efficiency at keeping good level quality of cut surface can be improved this approach.
References
Alagarsamy, S. V., Ravichandran, M., & Saravanan, H. (2021). Development of Mathematical Model for Predicting the Electric Erosion Behavior of TiO2 Filled Al-Zn-Mg-Cu (AA7075) Alloy Composite Using RSM-DFA Method. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 20 (01): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686721500013.
Balasz, B., Szatkiewicz, T., & Krolikowski, T. (2007). Grinding Wheel Topography Modeling with Application of an Elastic Neural Network. Edited by Huang, DS and Heutte, L and Loog, M. Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications, Proceedings: With Aspects of Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag 2007.
Chanakyan, C., & Sivasankar, S. (2020). Parametric Studies in Friction Stir Welding on Al-Mg Alloy with (HCHCr) Tool by Taguchi Based Desirability Function Analysis (DFA). Journal of Ceramic Processing Research 21 (6): 647–55. https://doi.org/10.36410/JCPR.2020.21.6.647.
Derringer, G., & Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables. Journal of Quality Technology 12 (4): 214–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968.
Devarajaiah, D., & Chandrasekaran, M. (2018). Evaluation of Power Consumption and MRR in WEDM of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy and Its Simultaneous Optimization for Sustainable Production. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 40 (8): 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1318-y.
Dhanawade, A., & Shailendra, K. (2019). Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Carbon Epoxy Composite: Cutting Performance, Predictive Models and Optimization. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Science 26 (3–4): 265–75.
Fajdek-Bieda, A. (2021). Using Entropy-VIKOR Method in Chemical Processes Optimization. Procedia Computer Science 192: 4208–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.197.
Gostimirovic, M., Pucovsky, V., Sekulic, M., Rodic, D., & Pejic, V. (2019). Evolutionary Optimization of Jet Lag in the Abrasive Water Jet Machining. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 101 (9–12): 3131–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3181-5.
Harrington, J. (1965). The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control 21: 494–98.
“Jinhong Mining Catalog of Products.”. Lianyungang Jinhong Mining Co. Ltd. October 10, 2019. http://www.lygjhky.com/Hva_En/Catalog.pdf, (access 11.10.2021).
Krolczyk, G., Kacalak, W., & Wieczorowski, M. (2021). 3D Parametric and Nonparametric Description of Surface Topography in Manufacturing Processes. Materials, Basel, Switzerland, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081987.
Bouzid, L., Athmane, Y.M., Belhadi S., & Haddad, A. (2020). Modelling and Optimization of Machining Parameters during Hardened Steel AISID3 Turning Using RSM, ANN and DFA Techniques: Comparative Study. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences 14 (2): 6835–47. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.14.2.2020.23.0535.
Panda, S.N., Bagal, D.K., Kumar, A., Patnaik, D., Barua, A., Jeet, S., Parida, B., & Naik, B. (2020). Comparative Evaluation for Studying the Parametric Influences on Quality of Electrode Using Taguchi Method Coupled with MOORA, DFA, and TOPSIS Method for Electrochemical Machining. In Recent Advances in Mechanical Infrastructure, edited by Ajit Kumar Parwani and Pl. Ramkumar, 115–29. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9971-9_13.
Perec, A. (2021). Multiple Response Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Procedia Computer Science 192: 931–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.procs.2021.08.096.
Radomska-Zalas, A, Perec, A., & Fajdek-Bieda, A. (2019). IT Support for Optimisation of Abrasive Water Cutting Process Using the TOPSIS Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 710 (December): 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/710/1/012008.
Radomska-Zalas, A., & Fajdek-Bieda, A. (2021). IT Support for the Optimization of the Epoxidation of Unsaturated Compounds on the Example of the TOPSIS Method. In Intelligent Decision Technologies, edited by Ireneusz Czarnowski, Robert J. Howlett, and Lakhmi C. Jain, 238:297–307. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2765-1_25.
Radomska-Zalas, A., & Perec, A. (2019). Modeling of Abrasive Water Suspension Jet Cutting Process Using Response Surface Method. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2078 Issue 1:0200511–18. Volume 2078. Melville: AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5092054
SSAB Homepage. Accessed October 10, 2021. https://www.ssab.com/products/brands/hardox/products/ hardox-500, (access 11.10.2021).
